PA Man Faces Seven Years in Jail For Video Taping Police
On May 24 Brian D. Kelly of Carlisle, Pennsylvania was arrested for violating a state wiretapping law. Kelly, 18, videotaped police officers during a routine traffic stop. His camera was immediately confiscated and he was taken to jail. He spent 26 hours in county prison until his mother posted her house as collateral for his $2,500 bail.
What act was Mr. Kelly perpetrating in which the ‘great’ state of Pennsylvania saw as wiretapping?
Well, it turns out that there is an obscure state law that bars the intentional interception or recording of anyone’s oral conversation without their consent. The arrest apparently relates to the sound that Kelly’s camera picked up, not the video.
Some people would claim that ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’, but I would have to whole-heartedly disagree. How could someone possibly know that it is illegal to record an on-duty officer while on public property? It is not a law that one would assume exists based on common sense, such as murder or theft.
The only way that Kelly could have possibly known about this law would be if he actually read it. But lets be realistic, it could not honestly be expected that every citizen reads the tomes of laws that are passed, on state, local, and federal levels, every year, a process which would likely take an entire lifetime.
Kelly said that if he knew about this law before the incident occurred he would not have recorded the officers. What he does not seem to understand is that this is a law that does not make any sense and is blatantly unconstitutional. And bad laws, quite frankly, are meant to be broken.
Let me remind you of the text of the fourth amendment. It reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” The word unreasonable allows for some gray area, but I am sure that most people (a jury of our peers, perhaps) would agree that it was unreasonable for the police to take his camera.
The only ‘crime’ Kelly is guilty of is recording the officers doing their jobs, an act that should never be illegal in a free society. Is it not our duty as citizens to make sure that the police — and all other government employees for that matter — are doing their jobs properly? If not, then whose responsibility is it? And who watches them?
This law is an enemy of Liberty and needs to be repealed. It may have been passed with good intentions, i.e. prevention of blackmail, but we all know how to pave the road to hell. Only Police Officers — and others who seek to abuse their powers — truly benefit from laws like this one.
Realize this: Any protest that ever takes place in Pennsylvania can not legally be recorded by bystanders. This allows the police, who can potentially abuse their power, to confiscate the cameras of anyone who records them, essentially eliminating evidence of any possible wrong doing.
We are losing civil liberties in this country everyday and — I don’t know about you — but I’m getting sick and tired of it.
If you still do not believe that the country we live in resembles a police state, I have a simple question for you: What will it take for you to open your eyes?
Yesterday they stole away habeas corpus. Today we can not record the police. Tomorrow they remove our right to a trial by jury. Then they take away our guns. What will we have then? Only a hollow shell of the republic that our Founders once envisioned.




June 18th, 2007 at 1:29 am
What’s even worse is that police cars are equipped with dash cameras that record audio from the officer’s mic as well as video of you in and out of your car. But wait — isn’t it illegal to record without consent? Oh, that’s right… the police are above the law!
June 18th, 2007 at 2:45 am
While I agree with some of what you wrote-it is unacceptable to give more power and allow corruption to people that have a history of that potential, i do disagree with your tone. It is a tone like this that give power to the opposing argument. Why do you have to be sarcastic about the “great” state of pennsylvania? It has a rich history, so why does this one incident mar that? With power comes corruption, its your job to stand up to it, but do so in a factual way, and leave your emotions and sarcasms behind!
June 18th, 2007 at 3:29 am
don’t some of these police cars record video and pick up sound of some of the arrests without consent.
June 18th, 2007 at 9:34 am
The Pa supreme court has rules that audio (along w/ video) is legal when recorded by a police vehicles camera. The same as is allowed when recording a person detained in a holding cell. To make the argument of corruption in regards to this matter is ignorance at best. How could recording an individual suspected of being involved in a crime or even a citizen on a traffic stop be viewed as a tool of corruption? To be totally honest, in most cases, a video and audio tape benefit the defense. You should really think before you blog.
June 18th, 2007 at 11:50 am
well it would be alot difernt if he was videoing a few terorists know wouldent it
June 18th, 2007 at 11:56 am
I used to live up by Carlise… trust me, the police there ARE corrupt… the officer was probably doing something illegal, and that’s why they were being taped. No doubt the tape has already been destroyed, with no one ever seeing it.
And I’m 99% sure the arresting officer didn’t know about this law when Kelly was arrested… he found it sometime after, and hoped it would stick. I feel, if the officer can’t tell you WHY your being arrested at the time your cuffed, he can’t arrest you. They shouldn’t be allowed to bring you in, then figure out how to keep you.
June 18th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
urrrrrrr…….am I missing the point here? This kid WAS taping police doing a traffic stop right?? So it is against the law for him to videotape police doing their job, yet the police are allowed to video tape themselves doing their job? Sounds a bit crazy to me!
June 19th, 2007 at 12:32 am
i kno him…dont like him at all…but i live in carlisle n yea the cops are like that…i got court tomorrow for some dumb shit like this….n its not the first time these pigs have gotten away with major bullshit around here….everyone i kno has had ona these run ins….definatly not the first one ive heard of gettin a life-fuckinup-felony either….jus most of em are doin time right now n arent out on tv n cant tell their story…..ice t said it best…’fuck the police’
June 19th, 2007 at 12:33 am
n oh yea its a felony third they wanna give him….MAXimum penalty is 7 years….who gets the maximum on the first offense
June 21st, 2007 at 12:01 pm
This is a a right to privacy issue .The police are trying to say they can not be recorded carrying out there duty ,there public servants in a public place .Its been tried before and will like other cases be chucked out ,if it was’nt you would have tv crews getting arrested left right and center .Just hope the kid doesnt take a plee and end up with a record .POLICE HAVE NO RIGHT TO PRIVACY WHEN ON DUTY ,if they ever get it leave the country as fast as you can.
July 8th, 2007 at 11:26 am
This article made it to the on-line forum page of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Sunday, July 8, 2007:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07189/799822-109.stm
I can’t write a follow-up letter to the editor on this outrage because I’m on the PG’s 90 blackout list because with a letter of mine last month. I encourage people to write the PG regarding this story (letters@post-gazette.com, 250 words maximum, include a phone number for them to confirm intent to print).
A good rhetorical question might be to ask how the news media might react if one of their reporters or cameraman were arrested for recording an event involving a cop. It might even be better to ask a state representative if he thinks a reporter should have more rights than a private citizen.